As, I suppose, many other viewers, I welcome the Apple TV series “Foundation” as a dream coming true. I remember reading Asimov’s Foundation as a kid of 9 or 10 years old. Science fiction and comic books were my path toward the appreciation of literature. I read (in the Italian translation) many novels of the golden era of American sci-fi: A.E. van Vogt, Robert Heinlein and, yes, Asimov. While I never quite cared about his Robot stories, I loved the Foundation ones. I was unaware of the fact Asimov was somehow loosely inspired by Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (which instead I read only recently and would recommend heartily: it is such a magnificent work), but echoes of the fall of Rome were all over. How can we make the Middle Ages run faster? That is the question which Asimov and his alter ego, Hari Seldon, asked.
Seldon is the founder of a discipline called “psychohistory”, which is a pseudo-scientific version of the old dream of forecasting the future so that you can change it. It’s been literally more than twenty five years since I read it last, but Titus Techera has a marvelous essay on our sister website, Law and Liberty, on Asimov’s work. Here’s a bit:
In the Foundation trilogy, politics as a grand imperial adventure quickly turns into a boring affair of managing social unrest while keeping productivity growing. It’s fun to outsmart barbarians in the process of modernization, of rationalizing our decisions and actions, but the result is supremely uninspiring. As a result, Asimov can believe in scientific futurism, but not that science will elevate most men. All ordinary men can do is busy themselves to become wealthy while losing their religion, their politics, and their ways of life. The Foundation’s commercial empire degenerates into despotism, on the pattern of modern regimes called “dictatorships” by people too cowardly to say they are tyrannies.
Asimov is not, after all, interested in the Roman Empire, but in our modern problem—individualism. After the three modernizing geniuses whose individuality was tied up with a great enterprise on behalf of the Foundation, the protagonists in the Foundation trilogy are no longer rulers. Individuals don’t matter in a technological society; whatever their talents, they can only cause trouble. They look elsewhere. Asimov’s theme changes from the scientific improvement of society to morality, through a quest for the meaning of psycho-history. You see, Seldon had originally started two foundations. We’ve seen the one dedicated to natural science; the other masters magical powers of mind control. Half the trilogy is about the Foundation’s quest to discover and control this Second Foundation. Seldon needed this second one, too, because after all, once you predict the future, you have to make the prediction come true. Mankind’s destiny is in the mind, not the cosmos.
READER COMMENTS
Darlene
Nov 26 2021 at 12:10am
I couldn’t make it through the third episode of the TV series. While visually beautiful it is very boring. The changes made to the story are just lazy writing. The source material offers a far superior story that having been originally written as shorts lend itself naturally to Television. It is a shame they thought they needed to change it as much as they did.
Monica R Elwood
Nov 26 2021 at 9:53am
I agree with you. I was disappointed by the lack of real story, tbh. I’ll read the books again instead.
John
Nov 26 2021 at 2:12pm
I am done with 4 episodes and agree completely. I enjoyed this last episode a bit more because I did not expect it to be Foundation. Events are moving finally and the roots are Dr. Asimov. It isn’t Asimov though.
The cloning addition is taking too much time and not needed in the plot or adding much.
James Faulkner
Nov 26 2021 at 3:34pm
Darlene, I didn’t make it past episode one. The whole thing struck me as the usual poor effort of modern production. Visual spectacle does not equal a fine effort. As such, this awful attempt at Foundation will do to the series what the new Dune is doing to that fine work, and LOTR did to Tolkien, cheapened by current politics, additional unnecessary action scenes, a retelling that lacks any substance of the original. I understand, as far as cultural politics go, it’s fair to change character male to female, especially when written in a different time, but even that can take away from the enjoyment for real fans of the literature. The other thing it will do is encourage a whole new re reading of the series (great!) of which only the same ratio as always of readers will come out at the end with wide smiling minds, the remainder will have given up or not grokked the content. There are some forms of art that are not for the masses, and Asimov is one.
In all my time reading sci-fi/speculative fiction, and in observing our cultures, I have never seen Susan Calvin mentioned as one of primary female giants of sci-fi. If ever there was a role model, Susan Calvin is our girl. Let’s not forget wonderful Arkady. Neither have been celebrated in fiction as they should have. All I can say to the culture warriors who have clearly influenced the direction and production of the Foundation show, is that they have taken gold and made it into cheap plastic crap.
nobody.really
Nov 30 2021 at 1:45pm
As kids, my older brother introduced me to The Hobbit. And when his daughters had reached an appropriate age, he started reading to book to them at bedtime. I thought it would be fun to provide him with a graphic novel version (which I like very much–retaining pretty much all of the dialogue and omitting only Tolkien’s passages about flora and fauna, which I regard as an improvement), so I sent him a copy.
My brother sent the graphic novel back. He then explained that, for purposes of bedtime reading, Bilbo is a girl.
Shawn Martin
Nov 26 2021 at 9:14am
This series apart form some very excellent visual effects and some stylishly executed edits for those of us who back in anceint time read the original trilogy and carried a copy of i robot in the back our jeans is simply Foundation Only in name 😔 Almost nothing of the original story remains not the basic plot or characters or the logic and science of Asimov’s Writings.
Same that we now have elected role and gender swapping oppose to imagination. Well at least the latest remake of DUNE is very promising…
John
Nov 26 2021 at 4:14pm
I totally loved it.
When brother Day did his walk in the 🌞 and the finale….
Day shows how terrifying he is, and showing his power. And yet moments later…..
Great SF, loved it, and hope to see more soon.
Ken Sherwood
Nov 27 2021 at 12:13am
I have thoroughly enjoyed the series save for one, glaring and unacceptable change: the Laws of Robotics are central to Asimov’s work so having Demerzel kill not one but two humans is not only lazy writing, it is a direct violation of one of the most important elements of Asimov’s writing and philosophy.
Sal
Nov 27 2021 at 2:17pm
You forget the Zeroth Law from his Robot series. That explains the “inconsistency”.
Mathías
Nov 27 2021 at 10:27am
I watched the 10 episodes, but just because I am stubborn. I really wanted to stop after 2. I think you can enjoy it if You haven’t read the books. I, on the other hand, cannot. They ruined my favorite character of all times, when demerzel breaks the laws of robotic so naturally.
Briane
Nov 27 2021 at 11:12am
Whilst being visually impressive it is a total abomination and a perversion of the Asimov masterpiece.
There are far too many missives to list but it has been turned from an incredibly readable trilogy (initially) into a politically correct series of drivel that is boring and in no way follows the Asimov masterpiece.
Stacy Povey
Nov 28 2021 at 5:00am
I love the books but its obvious a direct translation to the screen would be pretty dull for most audiences, especially the earlier written books. This series has added a large amount of new material and mostly it works pretty well and adds actual characters and dynamic action where there was none in the first book and some elements from Forward the Foundation would be hard without reference to the robot stories to which they had no rights.
The distortion of Eto Demerzel to actually be able to kill is annoying but as the decision was to make this a completely different character is understandable given the rights issue. I think worse than this change is they way they changed the Foundation and its 1st and 2nd crisis (both combined) it stopped being the force of history and preparation Seldon had made and became more about heroic actions of Harding.
These changes aside what they have done is make a fairly good and compelling SF show which has some elements of the books but adds a lot of layering and detail that a tv show needs. I’m looking forward to season 2 and hoping they move it closer to the books with the slightly more dynamic later books.
Robert Cohen
Nov 29 2021 at 1:59pm
Many movies and tv shows have been inspired by Issac Asimov’s Foundation series. Finally a movie to tell the tale! The cliffhanger was weird; selling air to each other!?! Good luck with the happy ending. I can’t wait to see it. The Foundation series still inspired me today…
Marius Dinca
Dec 2 2021 at 6:07am
Isaac Asimov is my favorit writer.
This movie is the biggest disappointment I’ve ever had after watching a TV series. I couldn’t watch more than 2 episodes.
Terrible movie for Asimov’s lovers 🙁
Comments are closed.