To hear some people tell it, profits are pretty easy to come by. People accumulate wealth and enjoy unearned income by taking interest and capital gains. What is profit but a tax levied by the powerful on the powerless? What could be easier than kicking back, lighting a cigar, and watching the profits roll in like they do in so many mobile games?
Quite a lot of things, actually. Losing money is easy. It’s like starving: you don’t have to do much to make it happen. Earning profits–and I use the word earning deliberately–is just like earning any other kind of income. It’s hard. Earning wages requires working. Earning interest requires waiting. Earning rent is a little easier, perhaps, but future rents to land and other resources are capitalized into present prices. Earning profit requires judgment. This is how innovative entrepreneurs like Sol Price and Sam Walton were so successful. They looked at how people bought and sold, found it lacking, and introduced new ways of retailing. They chose wisely, and they were rewarded handsomely.
But if Sol Price and Sam Walton finished rich, that means someone else had to finish poor, right? Wrong. Price, Walton, and other successful entrepreneurs profit by creating something out of nothing. Obviously, they can’t create new matter, but they can rearrange it into “Big Box Stores” that no one had ever thought to put in southern California or northwest Arkansas.
We academics and others working in the non-profit sector are even pretty easy at fooling ourselves into thinking that we have forsaken the easy life of profit-seeking and wealth accumulation to do something more difficult, courageous, and noble. It’s not easy, though, to give people what they want at prices they are willing to pay without consuming even more valuable resources in the process. It’s one thing to pontificate about how this or that business idea would be successful, but it’s quite another to put your own money where your mouth is so you can actually try to make an idea work, all the while knowing that as the residual claimant, any losses come out of your pocket. I’m hard-pressed to think of anything much more noble than finding ways for people to get more bread for the sweat of their brow. As Ayn Rand’s character Francisco d’Anconia explains, successful entrepreneurs make money. Successful entrepreneurs win, but the biggest winners from the Bourgeois Deal are consumers like the rest of us. To the extent we have left them alone to try new things, they have made us rich.
Yes, interventionism means a lot of distortion and profits accruing to people not because they innovate successfully but because they prevent others from innovating. I would hope that both the left and the right could find a common cause in fighting the rent-seeking society. However, it’s the rare person I encounter who despises modern capitalism because the state introduces distortions making it hard for people to compete. They tend to hate capitalism precisely because it is a system where people like Sol Price and Sam Walton–neither descended from royalty or deity, as far as I know–got rich by making other people richer.
Business history is littered with failure. Making money is hard, and those who do it deserve our gratitude rather than our contempt.
Art Carden is Professor of Economics & Medical Properties Trust Fellow at Samford University, and he is by his own admission as Koched up as they come: he has an award named for Charles G. Koch in his office, he does a lot of work for and is affiliated with an array of Koch-related organizations, and he has applied for and received money from the Charles Koch Foundation to host on-campus events.
READER COMMENTS
Thomas L Hutcheson
Mar 20 2024 at 11:48am
Burning straw men (even genuinely bad and deserving-to-be-burned straw men :)) does not improve policy.
Ike Coffman
Mar 20 2024 at 2:18pm
I kind of think you are ignoring all the small businesses that were driven out of business by those big box stores. Been downtown in a reasonably small town lately? I see a bunch of dead storefronts.
Jon Murphy
Mar 21 2024 at 9:10am
You may find this post enlightening. The death of the “small business storefront” has been greatly exaggerated.
I’ll just add my own observation: I live in rural Louisiana (my town is the big town in the Parish with 15,000 residents). Though we have 2 Wal-Marts, we have a thriving small business scene. Downtown Thibodaux has lots of small businesses. The local IGA has the best baked goods. There’s a bakery near my place that has great cupcakes. There’s a woodworking gift shop that sells Louisiana-themed home items, all handmade by the owner.
The point is, you can travel all over and see small businesses thriving. Of course, there are also area where this is not the case: Cairo Illinois, Raceland Louisiana, just to name two I am familiar with. But, what is noticiable about both is they do not have big box stores nearby.
john hare
Mar 20 2024 at 5:48pm
As a small business owner, I fully understand how hard it is to make serious profits. Kicking back and letting others make you rich is a bad joke. Worse is how many people believe that that is what a businessman does. They see the gross income and not the expenses that can easily outrun that income. If it were all that easy, no business would ever go broke.
Peter
Mar 21 2024 at 1:08am
I get what you are trying to say but it never flies with the masses because it gets derailed with statements like “But if Sol Price and Sam Walton finished rich, that means someone else had to finish poor, right? ” which is true. Wealth/Income status is relative, neither Sol nor Sam could be rich if the poor didn’t exist nor if the wages paid to the poor increased at the exact same rate Sam/Sol increased their wealth. One eyed man land blind.
I get you understand that and it wasn’t key to your point but it was said said hence distracts from the overall valid point.
john hare
Mar 21 2024 at 1:47am
I seem to be reading your comment as Walton and company got rich by holding others down. Or possibly they got rich because others didn’t. I think we may be in severe disagreement if I understand your statements correctly.
Not that some don’t lose. Just that creating legitimate wealth is not on the backs of the losers.
Jon Murphy
Mar 21 2024 at 9:19am
As an empirical matter, I don’t think that’s true. I mean, they did form their businesses in a country where even the poor are not that poor by global standards. Furthermore, while Walmart and Costco benefit the relatively poor the most, they cater to all income groups. People like saving money, after all.
I think increases in household wealth may be the better comparison here rather than wages. Or real wages, in terms of what one can buy with those. In that case, one could reasonably argue that the poor are made better off at a faster rate than Sam or Sol increased their wealth. If we take Nordhous’s estimate than entrepreneures only keep about 2% of the wealth they generated, than 98% has been distributed to the poor.
David Seltzer
Mar 21 2024 at 3:49pm
Art: What is often unseen is the personal cost to individuals seeking profits. There is stress, often damaging one’s health. Long absences from families or loved ones. Businesses fail and one has to start over somewhere. I remember a business owner’s advice to a young entrepreneur wannabe. He said in a matter of days, the business owns you. You take it to bed with you and you take on vacation. The risks are such that the probability of success is about 20% the first five years. Those decrying successful businesses have little or no idea of these things or they wouldn’t make anti-market claims. Personal note. My father was a small town merchant who grew his business over twenty years. His bon mot was, I only worked half a day today. You know, twelve hours.
Comments are closed.