California has some of the strictest insurance regulations in the country. It is the only state where insurers are not allowed to base their rate hikes on catastrophe models — forward-looking calculations of risk — or the rising cost of reinsurance premiums, according to both Zimmerman and the Department of Insurance.
Under current regulations, insurers are only allowed to use catastrophe models to calculate rates for earthquake insurance. One proposed change under the Sustainable Insurance Strategy would expand that to wildfire risk, as well as the risk of post-earthquake fires and terrorism. Another proposed regulation yet to be released would also allow insurers to incorporate reinsurance costs into rate hikes, the department previously announced.
The above quote is from Megan Fan Munce, “Major California home insurer could resume writing new policies. Here’s what it would take,” San Francisco Chronicle, April 24, 2024.
In case you haven’t heard, price controls on home insurance are causing a number of insurers not to write new homeowners’ insurance policies and, in some cases, to quit the business in California. The two paragraphs above lay out one important way in which prices are controlled. Insurers are not allowed to base rates on expected risks.
While my wife and I are lucky because State Farm has said it will renew our policy, I’m not so lucky in another role. I’m a limited partner who owns approximately 1% of a large apartment complex in Bakersfield. Our insurer has told the general partner that it will not renew our insurance and he has been unable to find any insurer that will.
READER COMMENTS
Richard W. Fulmer
Apr 24 2024 at 7:54pm
Clearly, a market failure.
Mooseman
Apr 24 2024 at 8:30pm
Price controls cause supply shortages, despite the wishes of Californians.
Thomas L Hutcheson
Apr 24 2024 at 10:09pm
I used to wonder why there are always structures in California wildfire areas. Why wasn’t it too expensive to insure them?
Curiously, I’d expect not allowing insurance rates to be set according to climate models to be associated with red-state climate change deniers. Florida, sure, but California?
see:
https://thomaslhutcheson.substack.com/p/climate-risk-and-insurance
Jose Pablo
Apr 26 2024 at 7:45pm
Curiously, I’d expect not allowing insurance rates to be set according to climate models to be associated with red-state climate change deniers. Florida, sure, but California?
Well, I know that one, people love their money more than they love their “ideas”. Don’t trust what people say they want, trust they want what they are ready to spend their (own) money to get.
john hare
Apr 25 2024 at 4:14am
I have a problem with the price fixing of insurance companies by government fiat. Walmart doesn’t have government price controls that I am aware of and the parking lots seem to be full most of the time. Let them compete with just enough regulation to make sure they can honor claims.
Knut P. Heen
Apr 25 2024 at 10:29am
Diversify your portfolio! A well-diversified investor does not need insurance against unsystematic risk. Catastrophe risk is systematic risk, but the insurer will probably be bankrupt anyway if the catastrophe is bad enough.
Comments are closed.