GREENFIELD, Mass.–Al Norman has been fighting to keep Walmart and other big-box retailers out of small towns like this one for 25 years. He’s been successful in Greenfield, his hometown and the site of his first battle with Walmart, and in dozens of other towns across the country–victories he documents on his website Sprawl-Busters, an “International Clearinghouse on Big Box Anti-Sprawl Information.” Partly because of Norman’s efforts to keep out such stores, Greenfield still has a Main Street with dozens of businesses, including a bookstore, a record store, and Wilson’s, one of the last independently owned department stores in the country.
This is from Alana Semuels, “A Small Town Kept Walmart Out. Now It Faces Amazon.” The Atlantic.
Al Norman is a self-admitted intruder. Here’s his problem:
Greenfield and other towns across New England are learning that while they might have been able to keep out big-box stores through zoning changes and old-fashioned advocacy, there’s not much they can do about consumers’ shift to e-commerce. They can’t physically keep out e-commerce stores–which don’t have a physical presence in towns that residents could push back against–and they certainly can’t restrict residents’ internet access. “It’s one thing for me to try and fight over land use in the town I live in, or in somebody else’s town,” Norman told me, over lunch in a diner on Greenfield’s Main Street. “But e-shopping creates a real problem for activists, because on some level, shopping online is a choice people make, and it’s hard to intrude yourself in that.” (italics added)
And he did his best to intrude:
For the residents of Greenfield in particular, the decline of small businesses is hard to bear because the town has a history of resisting national companies that have tried to come in and set up shop. The first anti-Walmart battle, in the mid-1990s, was prompted after the town council rezoned a plot of land, thus allowing a developer to build a Walmart. Norman, the Sprawl Buster, led a ballot initiative to reverse that zoning decision, and his narrow win surprised just about everybody in Greenfield, including him. “We really tried to play up the idea that Greenfield had a lot to lose,” he told me. “Our slogan was, ‘You can buy cheap underwear at Walmart, but you can’t buy small-town quality of life anywhere.'”
A decade later, when a developer again tried to put a Walmart outside of town, Norman fought it because the new site was on a wetland. Eventually, the state’s Department of Environmental Protection forbade construction. Then, in 2011, when the developer reconfigured the site and won a planning board’s permission to build, Norman found plaintiffs to file a lawsuit against the developer that is still winding its way through court. He drove me by both sites when I was in town, and both are still tree-filled fields, rather than the big stores developers had envisioned.
HT@ Tom Hazlett
READER COMMENTS
Thomas Sewell
Mar 3 2018 at 7:13pm
Ironically, if they had a local Wal-mart, it could probably compete with the online sales for much longer and keep more local retail jobs and sales tax revenues going.
Can’t stop (super)market progress forever.
Mark Bahner
Mar 3 2018 at 11:30pm
The real killer for *all* brick and mortar retail–including Walmart, Target, Kroger, Lowe’s, Home Depot, Walgreens, etc. etc. etc.–will be e-commerce combined with delivery by robot-driven vehicles.
All brick-and-mortar stores need to have lighting and climate control, reasonably wide aisles, merchandise displayed in an appealing manner, sufficient check-out capacity and parking, etc. With e-commerce and robotic delivery vehicles, there is no need for any of those things, because the warehouses for the merchandise can be virtually entirely staffed by machines (combined with the robotic vehicles doing the delivery).
My prediction is that in 20-30 years, 90% of all brick-and-mortar stores of all types will be gone. That includes the Walmarts that were built in all the towns surrounding Greenfield. And it definitely includes all the small stores in Greenfield.
David O'Rear
Mar 4 2018 at 5:52am
The telling part is about cheap underwear. Protectionism is always about the poor, who are the first one’s to get hurt. They don’t shop at Target because they hate Macy’s. The shop there because they can’t afford not to.
No one ever shopped at Wal-Mart because they didn’t like the colors at Saks 5th Avenue.
Matthias Görgens
Mar 4 2018 at 8:54am
Mark, I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss brick and mortar just yet.
Aldi and Lidl in Germany eg are very good at competing with e-commerce. (That’s why the online grocery delivery marker is still is still so small in Germany.) Those two German discounters are also making inroads in US, UK, Australia and other countries.
Thomas, isn’t worrying about local retail jobs committing the fallacy of only looking at the visible things? Worrying about buying from out of town is the same as worrying about imports, isn’t it?
Won’t nobody think of the customer surplus?
Matthias Görgens
Mar 4 2018 at 8:54am
Mark, I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss brick and mortar just yet.
Aldi and Lidl in Germany eg are very good at competing with e-commerce. (That’s why the online grocery delivery marker is still is still so small in Germany.) Those two German discounters are also making inroads in US, UK, Australia and other countries.
Thomas, isn’t worrying about local retail jobs committing the fallacy of only looking at the visible things? Worrying about buying from out of town is the same as worrying about imports, isn’t it?
Won’t nobody think of the customer surplus?
Mark Z
Mar 4 2018 at 10:56am
Does Mr. Norman imagine shopping at big retail stores instead of more expensive small businesses is not also a choice consumers make? In any case, what an admirable job he’s done keeping affordable goods and services out of his town. I’m sure the poor and working class residents (if there are any) greatly appreciate it.
“My town fought tooth and nail to keep automobiles out; look, everyone still uses horses here! The buggy drivers all still have jobs!â€
another Mark
Mar 4 2018 at 11:28am
Low prices are not the only value worth pursuing. My wife grew up in a 5000 population county seat in the corn belt. There were lots of stores downtown, and the place buzzed on Saturdays. Distance from the big city made prices 10% higher. In return you got something that rich people pay a lot for. You got personal service from people who knew you. You got community. You got smiles and greetings. Walmart opened up just outside the city limits. Now the town is full of boarded up stores. I am not saying that Walmart is the only reason, but I am saying that costs and benefits should reflect the totality and not just price.
Gene
Mar 4 2018 at 11:45am
” … because on some level, shopping online is a choice people make, and it’s hard to intrude yourself in that.”
On some level? How about on every level, Al?
He sure sounds like he would try to insert himself into his neighbors’ online transactions if only he could figure out how. Al Norman, please stay far, far away from me.
David R Henderson
Mar 4 2018 at 2:05pm
@David O’Rear,
Well said.
@another Mark,
Low prices are not the only value worth pursuing. My wife grew up in a 5000 population county seat in the corn belt. There were lots of stores downtown, and the place buzzed on Saturdays. Distance from the big city made prices 10% higher. In return you got something that rich people pay a lot for. You got personal service from people who knew you. You got community. You got smiles and greetings. Walmart opened up just outside the city limits. Now the town is full of boarded up stores. I am not saying that Walmart is the only reason, but I am saying that costs and benefits should reflect the totality and not just price.
Well said. And one of the wonderful things about free markets is that people are free to make those tradeoffs. Al Norman wanted to have the government use force to prevent them from making those tradeoffs.
He sure sounds like he would try to insert himself into his neighbors’ online transactions if only he could figure out how. Al Norman, please stay far, far away from me.
Absolutely! That’s why I posted it. It was such an incredibly blunt confession.
Thomas Sewell
Mar 5 2018 at 3:14am
@Matthias Görgens,
I was noting the irony of Al Norman’s original position, not agreeing with his localism.
Specifically, I’m in favor of people shopping for the best deal for themselves from as many competing suppliers as possible and think people who campaign for local-only buying (and own-country only buying, for that matter) are economically ignorant.
A frequent argument I’ve used is to ask why those same localism people don’t buy everything from their own household only. Wouldn’t that keep all the money in their own family?
robc
Mar 5 2018 at 10:02am
It does reflect the totality, and apparently the majority thought the prices at Walmart outweighed the service. If not, the Walmart would have failed and the downtown stores would have thrived.
OTOH, I am not sure how well Walmart would do (it would still do good, just maybe with a slightly different model) if it wasn’t for the direct and indirect subsidies that towns give them.
Comments are closed.