I’ve heard many people on Facebook and elsewhere talk about how politicized the 2018 Olympics are. In this case, though, I think politics is in the eye of the beholder. Sure, I thought that Mike Pence had incredibly bad manners in standing only for the U.S. team at the opening ceremonies. And some of the mainstream media went gaga over the sister of North Korea’s chief murderer. But if you choose to focus on that, that’s your choice.
My wife and I have watched about 3 hours of Olympics every day–and have been loving it.
Sports
The sports are incredible. One of my favorites is curling–hey, I’m Canadian, you hoser. It reminds me of the fun I had in the only bonspiel I was ever in, in my last year of high school, a very tough year for me. I particularly like the way the husband and wife team from Russia tell each other to “sveep.”
The ice dancing has been wonderful: beautiful music, amazing moves, beautiful costumes, lots of emotion.
Japanese skater Yuzuru Hanyu was amazing. I loved his moves, his grace, and, after he was waiting for competitors’ results, the sweet way he interacted with the other at-the-time contenders for the medals.
Watching 6 men or 6 women racing downhill on snowboards side by side was amazing.
There are many more.
The one thing I didn’t like is the women’s hockey game between Canada’s team and the team from the Country that Dare Not Be Named. The refs missed an obvious icing call that allowed Canada to score. They also missed a high stick by a Canadian woman on a Russian woman’s chin. Although given how dominant the Canadian women were, they almost certainly would have won anyway.
Interviews with Athletes
My favorite was the interview with the French cross country men’s winner who won by a few inches and was so overcome with emotion. He made funny mistakes in English and then said that he was so stoked that he couldn’t even speak well in French.
I think Mike Tirico is doing a great job. He has a childlike appreciation for the events and the athletes and when he interviews them, he doesn’t prompt them to say what they “should” say but, instead, lets them talk.
Absence of Award Ceremonies
One thing I’ve liked about Olympics is the absence of award ceremonies. When say, three women are at the bottom of a hill and they find out that they are gold, silver, and bronze, they stand beside each other with their arms around each other and pose for a camera. I thought I would miss the anthems because I’m still emotionally moved by both the Canadian and the American anthems, but I find that I prefer the focus on the athletes and not the country.
I haven’t said a thing about the awful cost of the Olympics and the fact that millions of South Koreans are on the hook for billions of dollars. I’m not indifferent to the injustice. But it’s a sunk cost. Whether I watch the Olympics or not won’t at all affect that cost.
READER COMMENTS
Gallego
Feb 20 2018 at 4:35am
I’m afraid many of your points are, well, missing the point. For example, the award ceremony is not missing, it happens later. Or did you think the medals are in the bears or whatever they’re given? Also, Mike Pence wasn’t the only one standing only for his country, all did. It’s a sit down ceremony, and politicians only stand to greet their compatriots. And the charmingly sveeping Russian curler has been confirmed to use doping.
Btw. you seem to have missed my compatriot, Ester Ledecká, and her unexpected win in ladies’ super-G. Just look at her after-race reaction, priceless.
Hans
Feb 20 2018 at 6:43am
“Whether I watch the Olympics or not won’t at all affect that cost.”
Really? Television rights are the largest form
of revenue, for the corrupt IOC.
The trend for these types of events are coming to an end. By 2050, there will be no Olympic games nor
the IOC, replaced by spectacles which have an economic value and not the ever ballooning costs of Olympiad productions.
BTW, college NCAA football attendance has declined four years straight.
Matthias Görgens
Feb 20 2018 at 7:03am
The Olympic games are repeated. So how much people watch now does make a difference for the future.
Matthias Görgens
Feb 20 2018 at 7:03am
The Olympic games are repeated. So how much people watch now does make a difference for the future.
paul scott
Feb 20 2018 at 7:39am
No. TV coverage and Olympic Games are deservedly sinking into oblivion. Both are the pure politics of selective diversity and Inclusion. Meaningless
David R Henderson
Feb 20 2018 at 9:24am
@Gallego,
For example, the award ceremony is not missing, it happens later. Or did you think the medals are in the bears or whatever they’re given?
No, I understand that the award ceremonies occur. My point is that they weren’t on the TV programs I watched and I watched, and am watching, a lot.
Also, Mike Pence wasn’t the only one standing only for his country, all did. It’s a sit down ceremony, and politicians only stand to greet their compatriots.
Thanks for that explanation. I didn’t realize that.
And the charmingly sveeping Russian curler has been confirmed to use doping.
Didn’t know that. Doesn’t much affect my pleasure at watching. Was it the guy or his wife?
Btw. you seem to have missed my compatriot, Ester Ledecká, and her unexpected win in ladies’ super-G. Just look at her after-race reaction, priceless.
Actually, I didn’t miss her. It was great. My list was not meant to be exhaustive. Thanks for pointing it out.
@Hans,
The trend for these types of events are coming to an end. By 2050, there will be no Olympic games nor the IOC, replaced by spectacles which have an economic value and not the ever ballooning costs of Olympiad productions.
Unfortunately I’m unlikely to be around to bet you. But, given that you seem to think that I do affect things, are you suggesting that if I don’t watch the 2018 Olympics and refuse to watch the future Olympics, there will be no Olympics by, say, 2046?
Eric Hanneken
Feb 20 2018 at 10:46am
It’s the guy.
I’m not sure it’s confirmed, though. In other sports, there’s a “B” sample that has to be tested to guard against false positives. The stories I’ve found don’t make it clear whether that’s happened yet.
Gallego
Feb 20 2018 at 11:24am
B sample was tested, & positive. CAS has already formally opened the case yesterday (Feb 19). Russians seem to have a better understanding of how meldonium works, if they use it for a sport that clearly doesn’t require physical enhancement drugs.
JayT
Feb 20 2018 at 11:35am
You might not need to be super strong for curling, but you need a lot of stamina in your arms to keep brushing the ice as fast as they do. The stuff he took improves blood flow, which would make it take longer to wear out.
Gallego
Feb 20 2018 at 12:34pm
JayT:
I don’t wanna argue, but why doesn’t anyone else use it in that case? This is clearly not a sport where stamina would be the limit of performance. And why has he used it in mixed curling if that consists of much less stones than the regular, 4-a-side curling, and therefore even less stamina is needed?
Hans
Feb 21 2018 at 1:14am
Ratings are tanking faster than a NOKO submarine.
http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2018/02/20/icy-ratings-nbcs-winter-olympics-coverage/
Comments are closed.