Although she [Ayn Rand] was normally generous in her responses to general audiences, NBI [Nathaniel Branden Institute] students were held to higher standards. Rand was likely to denounce anyone who asked inappropriate or challenging questions “as a person of low self-esteem” or to have them removed from the lecture hall. In front of journalists she called one questioner “a cheap fraud” and told another, “If you don’t know the difference between the United States and Russia, you deserve to find out!” These were moments of high drama, with Rand shouting her angry judgments to the widespread applause of the audience. But this antagonism toward his paying customers made Nathan extremely uncomfortable, and he began discouraging her from attending lectures. (italics added)
This is from Jennifer Burns, Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand the American Right. I’m enjoying it, but it’s not as good as Anne C. Heller’s book, Ayn Rand and the World She Made, that I briefly reviewed earlier (here and here). I think Heller tells more-complete stories in various places and I particularly liked her stories about Rand’s earlier life in the 1930s and 1940s when Rand was less isolated and more willing to work in coalitions.
READER COMMENTS
Burk
Dec 29 2009 at 2:14pm
Is there a particular reason why a charlatan and ideologue like Rand would appear on a blog putatively about “economics”?
RL
Dec 29 2009 at 2:25pm
Ignoring the intended slur, is there any particular reason an economist cannot make an imminently economic point using charlatans and ideologues as examples?
It should be no more difficult, really, than using a banal comment to make a point about logic…
ad hominem
Dec 29 2009 at 5:39pm
Is there any particular reason that anyone would avoid a discussion about someone’s economic views by simply labeling him/her as a charlatan and ideologue?
Bob Murphy
Dec 29 2009 at 6:37pm
RL,
That was awesome.
RL
Dec 30 2009 at 12:38am
Bob,
🙂
Very flattering, esp. as I’m an admirer of your work.
Comments are closed.