Last year, the Federal Reserve announced a policy termed “flexible average inflation targeting.” The basic idea is that the Fed commits to insuring that PCE inflation will average roughly 2% over an extended period of time, and that any short run discrepancies will be offset by future overshoots in the opposite direction. Although they did not specify a starting point, it’s generally assumed to be roughly the beginning of the decade (say January 2020.) Thus inflation should average 2% during the 2020s.
As of today, we see the following TIPS spreads, which are a crude proxy of bond market inflation forecasts:
5 years: 2.20%
10 years: 2.14%
30 years: 2.14%
Because TIPS holders are compensated according to the CPI, and because the CPI inflation rate tends to run about 25 basis points above the PCE inflation (which the Fed is actually targeting, these TIPS spreads imply roughly this sort of expected PCE inflation:
5 years: 1.95%
10 years: 1.89%
30 years: 1.89%
PCE inflation, however, has been only about 1.1% over the past 12 months. So in principle, you want to see PCE inflation expectations of slightly over 2%/year for the next 5 years–say 2.2%, and very close to 2% over the next 30 years.
Nonetheless, these recent TIPS spreads are really good news. In my view, they are not statistically different from what you’d expect if the Fed’s new AIT policy were completely credible.
There are two reasons why the current 2.14% 30-year TIPS spread is consistent with Fed credibility. First, my estimate of the CPI/PCE discrepancy (0.25%) is backward looking. It’s quite possible that markets expect the gap to be slightly lower going forward. Second, it’s possible that the TIPS spread slightly underestimates actual market inflation expectations, due to the fact that conventional bonds are slightly more liquid than TIPS, and hence can be sold at a slightly low expected yield.
These two factors together can explain the small discrepancy between actual TIPS spreads and the sort of spread you’d see with perfect AIT credibility. Fed policy may not be perfect, but any imperfections are not statistically significant. This is a major achievement.
Of course I’d prefer level targeting, and especially NGDP level targeting. If they must target inflation, I’d prefer they target core PCE inflation. But even a successful implementation of AIT would be pretty good, relative to what we saw in many earlier decades such as the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 2010s.
Now they need to carry through with what they’ve promised. PCE inflation needs to actually average 2% during the 2020s. But don’t underestimate the importance of moving market expectations close to the policy target. That’s an important first step. As recently as March 19, 5-year TIPS spread had fallen to 0.14%. So today’s 2.20% looks pretty good.
READER COMMENTS
marcus nunes
Jan 20 2021 at 10:14pm
Scott, to refresh your memory:
https://www.themoneyillusion.com/six-reasons-to-abolish-inflation/
“I don’t propose to abolish the phenomenon of inflation, but rather the concept of inflation. And to be more precise, price inflation, which is what almost everyone means by the term. I want it stripped from our macroeconomic theories, removed from our textbooks, banished into the dustbin of discarded mental constructs.”
Dan
Jan 20 2021 at 10:33pm
That’s such a fun post. I’m half-tempted to share it with my macro students, but I’m afraid it would blow their minds.
Scott Sumner
Jan 21 2021 at 3:10pm
Thanks Marcus.
John Hall
Jan 20 2021 at 10:34pm
A colleague is concerned that the rise in the share of TIPs outstanding owned by the Fed means that the higher spread is due to manipulation. Wouldn’t investors still be able to arbitrate that if the numbers are manipulated?
Matthias
Jan 21 2021 at 12:19am
Even on a small budget you could lock in some profits, if you think the market TIPS spread is wrong.
Whether that trade would move market prices and thus the market TIPS spread depends on the budget of the arbitrageurs vs how much the Fed is willing and able to lose.
Scott Sumner
Jan 21 2021 at 3:15pm
How does their share of TIPS compare to their share of Treasuries?
John Hall
Jan 25 2021 at 8:39am
About 20% of the TIPs outstanding are held in SOMA. My recollection is that the Treasury bond ownership is of a similar magnitude, but I couldn’t find the exact numbers quickly.
Thomas Hutcheson
Jan 21 2021 at 9:14am
I agree that Fed performance has improved significantly. [If I wanted to troll Liberals (I do not as I am one), I might ask if the improvement was the result of a “Trump scare” 😊] I suppose that one cannot reject the null hypothesis that the Fed now has a AIT going forward over some indefinite period of 2% PCE for the “stable prices” half of its dual mandate.
Still, having allowed the TIPS to fall so far below target and to remain
I agree that Fed performance has improved significantly [If I wanted to troll Liberals (I do not as I am one) I might ask it the performance was the result of a “Trump scare” 😊] I suppose that one could even not reject the null hypothesis that the Fed now has a AIT going forward over some indefinite period of 2% PCE for the “stable prices” half of its dual mandate. Still, having allowed the TIPS to fall so far below target and to remain for so many months below target [and backward-looking CPI-PCE difference is more like 0.3% than 0.25%] in response to a supply shock, and for the 5-year TIPS to remain below the 10-year rate, at least raises doubts.
To resolve this uncertainty, would it not be better for the Fed to announce changes in policy in terms of the CPE price level X years in the future? And should the Treasure not start issuing CPE-inked securities including at 1- and 3-year maturities to help the Fed better communicate its policy. [For the Fed not to issue statements that can interpreted as it’s needing fiscal policy help to fulfill its mandates would also be a good idea.]
To reduce this uncertainty, would it not be better for the Fed to announce changes in policy in terms of the CPE price level X years in the future? Should the Treasure not start issuing CPE-inked securities including at 1- and 3-year maturities to help the Fed better communicate its policy? And wouldn’t it help for the Fed not to keep issue statements that can interpreted as it’s needing fiscal policy assistance to fulfill its mandates?
Scott Sumner
Jan 21 2021 at 3:15pm
Thomas, You asked:
“And wouldn’t it help for the Fed not to keep issue statements that can interpreted as it’s needing fiscal policy assistance to fulfill its mandates?”
Yes!
Tom
Jan 21 2021 at 11:59am
We, as a nation, should pay Jerome Powell and all the Fed members a $1 billion bonus every year the TIPS spreads stay within 2.0-2.5%. It’s crazy that with livelihood of hundreds of millions on the line, the only incentives for good monetary policy are a sense of civic duty and attaboys from economic blogs.
Scott Sumner
Jan 21 2021 at 3:14pm
I once made a similar proposal in a blog post.
David S
Jan 22 2021 at 6:17pm
Whats even more crazy is that it seems to work!
Comments are closed.