As his flying truck was clearing the half-frozen runway, Santa reflected on how the world had changed. His co-pilot was his Chief Diversity Officer, a blue non-binary person. (Ze was also his Chief Scientific Officer.) Her presence was not formally required by law but Santa knew he would otherwise get in trouble with “the authorities” and their armies of bien pensant minions. Not that Santa held any partisan political opinion: for decades, he had delivered the gifts requested by children, with due consideration to their parents’ wishes, and just wanted his customers to be happy. He had been a smiling merchant.
“Merchant” is not the correct term because, as is well known, Santa did not charge anything for his services. But that was not an excuse for ignoring officially-defined fairness, as Google, Facebook, and Twitter had learned in times past. It must however be admitted that Santa partly financed his activities with ads from Amazon, the logo of which figured on all his gift bags. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Also, his flying truck was loaned by Space X and bore the company’s logo: there is no such thing as a free launch either.
At that time, historians will recall, Amazon was still trying to survive a long decline while fighting new legal challenges from antitrust authorities, who had been lobbied by some new competitors. Poor economics, of course. Heavily subsidized universities had stopped teaching standard economics which, it was complained, transmitted “an oversized and anti-social view of the individual.”
The State of California had forced Santa to fill 10% of his cargo space with non-gendered gifts. Although the required proportion did not correspond to straight demographics, it made sense given that non-gendered people were more privileged and much wealthier than average and typically spent much more on their children’s gifts. In a rare fit of dark humor, the old Santa had filled the mandated space with cowyouth revolver toys. The packaging of the gun toys also warned: “For Social Justice Enforcement Only.” Long guns bore the inscription “The Long Arm of the Law.”
It would be incorrect to believe that Santa had become a moral nihilist. On the contrary, he had simple moral beliefs, perhaps reminiscent of what Honoré de Balzac said of a character (Borgeat) in one of his novels: “This man’s faith was perfect; he loved the Virgin Mary as he might have loved his wife.” (In the French original: « Cet homme avait la foi du charbonnier. Il aimait la sainte Vierge comme il eût aimé sa femme. ») This did not fit well with the Brave New World, where the simple person’s morality now consisted in worshipping Gaia, claiming for sacrifices to social justice, and obeying the authorities.
Entering America’s airspace was not easy but it was just business as usual. A Great Invisible Wall had been created that blocked any foreigner until he could be vetted. As an exclusive service to good American citizens, the federal government was offering the completely free insertion under the skin of a complimentary microchip that automatically opened The Wall, except of course if an order from a secret court dictated otherwise. (These national security measures had been reconducted under the latest Matriot Act, renamed to position it squarely against patriarchy.) Santa had to produce personal and customs e-documents, show the QR of his special cabotage permit (the Jones Act had been recently modernized), provide a link to his DNA profile and complete medical file, answer questions, and swear not to make any trouble. He was not comfortable with that promise but he was not a pure Kantian and thought that lying, although generally wrong, could be justified under special circumstances such as coercion.
As Friedrich Hayek wrote in a 1973 book, “The first attempt to secure individual liberty by constitutions has evidently failed.” Santa had not read Hayek, who was by then totally forgotten after being openly censored as an old white man.
Crossing The Wall was only the beginning of Santa’s problems. Once he started landing on roofs, he saw that the vast majority of chimneys had warnings such as “Only Local Toys Accepted,” “Union-Made Toys Only,” “No Sexist Toys,” “No Gun Toys,” “Blue-Made Toys Only,” “Nothing But Educative Toys,” “No Foraign [sic] Stuff,” “Warning: Inclusive House.”
When in the weeks preceding Christmas, Santa had met little boys and girls in stores and shopping malls, he whispered in their ears: “If your gifts are not by the chimney, go and see outside the backdoor of your house or outside your school.” (An increasing number of families lived in public or subsidized apartment blocks as opposed to single-family houses, which were said to “waste our national resources.”)
By Christmas morning, all children had received the gifts they had asked for—except for a few inappropriate requests from naughty kids and, of course, from children in jail, where deliveries were forbidden. An electronic Christmas card accompanied each gift, paraphrasing a reflection by (now officially canceled) economist James Buchanan: “You will need liberty to become the individual you want to become.” Interestingly, Santa had heard about Buchanan, perhaps in Econlib or Regulation articles that circulated on the dark web.
After Santa had delivered his last gift, any passerby would have heard a short burst (ho-ho-ho) of his famous laugh. He then hurried back to the North Pole, his truck in hypersonic mode, to escape being canceled by the mob or arrested by its very representative government.
READER COMMENTS
Joseph Hertzlinger
Dec 24 2021 at 12:50pm
I’m reminded of “Sanity Claus” by Edward Wellen, the 1970s version of this, in which “Ho ho ho” was short for “Ho Ho Ho Chi Minh.”
Pierre Lemieux
Dec 25 2021 at 4:04pm
Joseph: Thanks for the reference.
Jose Pablo
Dec 24 2021 at 4:41pm
A very nice one, Pierre!
Although by the time of your tale, Santa would have been, very likely, already “cancelled” … come on! he is white, male and very likely, uses slave labor …
… same way that the 3 Wise Men are in the process of being cancelled in Europe. Sure, they embrace diversity but their religious connections and their habit of using animals on their performances are very difficult to accept … and, on top of that, the late deliveries …
Pierre Lemieux
Dec 24 2021 at 5:38pm
Jose: In my understanding (and in the tale), Santa does not use slave labor but voluntary workers who prefer working for him than at Facebook. But I understand your point: some people seem to think that voluntarily working for wages is slavery while being forced to obey state diktats is freedom.
David Seltzer
Dec 24 2021 at 5:00pm
Pierre, the satire is biting and sad.
Pierre Lemieux
Dec 24 2021 at 5:32pm
David: Isn’t it the reality that is sad?
David Seltzer
Dec 27 2021 at 5:46pm
Yes.
Phil H
Dec 25 2021 at 3:15am
It’s just the standard sad old lie:
“non-gendered people were more privileged…”
Being gender-nonconforming (or in previous rounds of political correctness, a woman, or black, or gay) has not usually been a privileged way to live.
Pierre Lemieux
Dec 25 2021 at 2:16pm
Phil H: For the record, I did not mean that non-gendered people or women or LGBTQ+ were “privileged” because of their eccentric preferences (influenced by genetics in some cases). First of all, I am just reporting a tale, not writing a scientific paper. Secondly and more importantly, the woke were not privileged because they were weird, but they could be weird only because they were privileged: they earned high incomes in government, universities, or other subsidized institutions. Just look where the woke nonsense originated: universities including top ones charging $50,000 a year and more in tuition. Ordinary people, who have to really work (as opposed to being subsidized) to earn a living, would have nothing of that.
Thomas Strenge
Dec 25 2021 at 6:40pm
For anyone enjoying the above satire and able to understand German, I recommend Lisa Eckhart and Olaf Schubert. Dave Chappelle and Ricky Gervais are not the only ones crushing the wokistas with superior wit.
Pierre Lemieux
Dec 25 2021 at 11:04pm
Thomas: Thanks for the compliment. Unfortunately, I don’t read German… On Chappelle, The Economist had a good piece two months ago: https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/10/14/dave-chappelle-for-gender-realism
Comments are closed.